<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Hutchens Blog &#187; Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sandyhutchens.net/category/canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sandyhutchens.net</link>
	<description>By Sandy Hutchens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:46:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Fixed rate mortgage popularity wanes</title>
		<link>http://sandyhutchens.net/2010/01/fixed-rate-mortgage-popularity-wanes/</link>
		<comments>http://sandyhutchens.net/2010/01/fixed-rate-mortgage-popularity-wanes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial Adviser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fixed rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[popularity wanes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyhutchens.net/?p=140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The number of fixed rate mortgages taken out via intermediaries fell significantly between the third and fourth quarters of 2009.
According to the Financial Adviser Confidence Tracking (FACT) Index complied by mortgage lender Paragon, the proportion of fixed rate cases introduced by mortgage brokers fell from 62% in the third quarter to 46% in the final [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="495" height="301" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Qzy7j4uWWtk&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="495" height="301" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Qzy7j4uWWtk&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>The number of fixed rate mortgages taken out via intermediaries fell significantly between the third and fourth quarters of 2009.</p>
<p>According to the Financial Adviser Confidence Tracking (FACT) Index complied by mortgage lender Paragon, the proportion of fixed rate cases introduced by mortgage brokers fell from 62% in the third quarter to 46% in the final quarter of the year.</p>
<p>The dip represented the second consecutive quarterly fall in the popularity of fixed rate deals, after two quarterly increases in the first half of 2009.</p>
<p>Paragon attributed the lapse in fixed rate popularity to the perceived decreasing likelihood of a rise in Bank Base Rate.</p>
<p>Conversely, tracker mortgages got far more popular over the period, accounting for 45% of all mortgages arranged by brokers, compared to 33% in the third quarter of the year.</p>
<p>The index recorded that discount rate mortgages made up 6% of all mortgages arranged, with capped rate and cashback cases accounting for less than 3% of mortgage business.</p>
<p>John Heron, Paragon Mortgages’ managing director, said:</p>
<p>&#8220;We saw the proportion of fixed rate cases rise substantially in both the first and second quarters of the year, which is understandable as the Bank of England base rate had tumbled and borrowers wanted to lock themselves into attractive deals before the rate started to rise again.</p>
<p>&#8220;However, the rates attached to fixed rate deals are currently less attractive and borrowers increasingly opted for tracker deals during the latter half of the year, particularly in the final quarter.&#8221;</p>
<p>Interest-only mortgages represented just 18% of all broker-introduced deals, the lowest proportion since the third quarter of 2004.</p>
<p>That is in part down to the decrease in buy-to-let deals being taken out, as there are very few of these mortgages (usually arranged on an interest-only basis) available. Also, as lenders have tightened up their criteria, fewer will allow people to take out interest-only deals on their residential mortgages.</p>
<p>The reduction may also be an indication that borrowers are being more sensible and conservative, and avoiding interest-only deals, which are inherently higher-risk than repayment-type deals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandyhutchens.net/2010/01/fixed-rate-mortgage-popularity-wanes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First in “Rule of Law” series to look at humanitarian intervention</title>
		<link>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/first-in-%e2%80%9crule-of-law%e2%80%9d-series-to-look-at-humanitarian-intervention/</link>
		<comments>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/first-in-%e2%80%9crule-of-law%e2%80%9d-series-to-look-at-humanitarian-intervention/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Society of Upper Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anna Maria Tremonti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[event]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgette Gagnon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry S. Laforme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[responsibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hutchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyhutchens.net/?p=50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A panel of distinguished experts in human rights, foreign policy and international law will talk about “reconciling state sovereignty with the global responsibility to protect,” at a forum taking place at the Law Society on April 6, 2009, says Sandy Hutchens.
The event is being held by the Law Society and its Human Right Monitoring Group, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A panel of distinguished experts in human rights, foreign policy and international law will talk about “reconciling state sovereignty with the global responsibility to protect,” at a forum taking place at the Law Society on April 6, 2009, says Sandy Hutchens.<br />
The event is being held by the Law Society and its Human Right Monitoring Group, and is the first in its Rule of Law Education Series. Event partners are Amnesty International Canada, Canadian Lawyers Abroad, Canadian Lawyers for International Human Rights, Human Rights Watch and Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada.<br />
Panellists will look at the political, legal and moral questions of humanitarian intervention – when it is appropriate for states to take action against another state to protect people from catastrophe, genocide and crimes against humanity. They will also look at the “The Responsibility to Protect” doctrine produced by the International Commission on International and State Sovereignty, and discuss how it applies to contemporary cases. Panel members include:</p>
<ul>
<li>Georgette Gagnon, Executive Director, Africa Division, Human Rights Watch</li>
<li>The Honourable Harry S. Laforme – Judge, Court of Appeal for Ontario</li>
<li>Pacifique Manirakiza – Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa</li>
<li>The Honourable Bob Rae – Member of Parliament, Former Premier of Ontario</li>
</ul>
<p>The panel discussion will be moderated by Sharmini Peries, a journalist with the Real News Network. Following the forum, a reception will be held featuring Anna Maria Tremonti, award winning journalist and host of the CBC’s current affairs program, The Current.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/first-in-%e2%80%9crule-of-law%e2%80%9d-series-to-look-at-humanitarian-intervention/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Connecting Across Language and Distance: Linguistic and Rural Access to Legal Information and Services</title>
		<link>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/connecting-across-language-and-distance-linguistic-and-rural-access-to-legal-information-and-services/</link>
		<comments>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/connecting-across-language-and-distance-linguistic-and-rural-access-to-legal-information-and-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Society of Upper Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Distance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[French language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Thomson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Cohl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linguistic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rural]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hutchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyhutchens.net/?p=48</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Toronto, ON &#8211; The Law Foundation of Ontario is pleased to announce the release of the report &#8220;Connecting Across Language and Distance: Linguistic and Rural Access to Legal Information and Services&#8221; prepared by Karen Cohl and George Thomson, two public policy experts with justice experience.




Image via Wikipedia



The Law Foundation of Ontario commissioned this report because [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">Toronto, ON &#8211; The Law Foundation of Ontario is pleased to announce the release of the report &#8220;Connecting Across Language and Distance: Linguistic and Rural Access to Legal Information and Services&#8221; prepared by Karen Cohl and George Thomson, two public policy experts with justice experience.</p>
<div class="zemanta-img zemanta-action-dragged" style="margin: 1em; display: block; text-align: justify;">
<div>
<dl class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px;">
<dt class="wp-caption-dt"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Visible_Minorities_of_Ontario.png"><img title="Visible minorities of Ontario in 2001." src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/c7/Visible_Minorities_of_Ontario.png/300px-Visible_Minorities_of_Ontario.png" alt="Visible minorities of Ontario in 2001." width="300" height="231" /></a></dt>
<dd class="wp-caption-dd zemanta-img-attribution" style="font-size: 0.8em;">Image via <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Visible_Minorities_of_Ontario.png">Wikipedia</a></dd>
</dl>
</div>
</div>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Law Foundation of Ontario commissioned this report because so many of the<br />
grant applications it received identified access to justice for linguistic minorities and residents of rural and remote parts of the province as an area of concern. In addition to its ongoing funding of access to justice initiatives, the Foundation decided to engage in a broader consultation to better understand the problem and to generate recommendations for improvement.</p>
<p style="text-align: justify;">The Connecting Report describes significant barriers to access to legal information and services for people who do not speak English or French and people living in rural or remote areas, reviews efforts in many jurisdictions to reduce these barriers and suggests possible approaches for Ontario. It provides recommendations for improving linguistic and rural access to justice. The Connecting Report recommends strategic investment in the following six areas:</p>
<ul>
<li>Improving the capacity of non-legal community organizations to provide legal information and referrals</li>
<li>A regional planning model for a designated geographic area</li>
<li>Creation of a network of legal interpreters</li>
<li>Videoconferencing</li>
<li>Articling positions for organizations providing legal services to persons isolated by language or distance</li>
<li>Evaluating the above initiatives and establishing a clearinghouse for information about efforts to address access to justice issues.</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: justify;">Sandy Hutchens welcomes this report which is a valuable resource for all those who are interested in access to justice issues and is now considering the report&#8217;s recommendations. It particularly wishes to thank the many community organizations and individuals who participated in the consultation process that led to this report.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px; text-align: justify;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/2173e9f0-c370-437d-87be-7aa27b001749/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=2173e9f0-c370-437d-87be-7aa27b001749" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/connecting-across-language-and-distance-linguistic-and-rural-access-to-legal-information-and-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>London, Ontario &#8211; Economic Trends &#8211; Employment</title>
		<link>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/london-ontario-economic-trends-employment/</link>
		<comments>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/london-ontario-economic-trends-employment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labour economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hutchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hutchins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tertiary sector of the economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyhutchens.net/?p=44</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given the weakness in the manufacturing sector, soft service sector employment, and more new entrants to the labour force, the overall unemployment rate is expected to reach nine per cent in 2009. Employment in the goods producing sector continues to weaken largely due to the soft job condition in the London CMA&#8217;s automotive sector.
Areas where [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the weakness in the manufacturing sector, soft service sector employment, and more new entrants to the labour force, the overall unemployment rate is expected to reach nine per cent in 2009. Employment in the goods producing sector continues to weaken largely due to the soft job condition in the London CMA&#8217;s automotive sector.<br />
Areas where employment relies on Detroit Three Auto makers, says Sandy Hutchens, are especially hard hit, resulting in plant closures. Some areas in London depend more on Japanese auto makers such as Toyota and Suzuki. Though these manufacturers are not expecting to trim jobs, weak demand for both vehicles and light trucks in the U.S will keep them from adding shifts. While the automotive sector weakens, construction sector jobs have been recovering from the decline during the last quarter of 2008. Infrastructure investments in the London CMA will help boost employment in the con- struction sector.<br />
London&#8217;s solid service sector isbrown beginning to show some sign of weakness. After several years of expansion, its growth has slowed due to losses in several service industries. These include education, transportation, accommodation and other services. However, the number of high paying health care sector jobs continues to expand due to more investment in the health care sector in the London CMA.<br />
The labour force in the London CMA will increase by 2 per cent in 2009. In conjunction with recent lay offs in the manufacturing sector, this will result in a higher unemployment rate as more people compete for fewer jobs in the market. Employment in the 25 to 44 year age group generally associated with first-time buying decreased more rapidly compared employment for the 45 to 54 age group associated with move-up buying or the 55 to 64 age group often referred to as empty nesters. First-time buyers accounts for the largest category of London&#8217;s population. The deteriora- tion in first-time buyers&#8217; job condi- tions will delay their transition into homeownership.</p>
<p><strong>Migration</strong></p>
<p>With a soft job market, migration is forecast to slow in 2009 in the London CMA. Employment is the major factor for attracting migrants to this region. Much of the migration to London during the past few years was drawn by solid service sector expan- sion. With a softer service sector job market, the outflow of residents is expected to continue, especially to western Canada. There will also be fewer people moving into London from other areas in Ontario.<br />
International migration will slow as well. The impact of slowing interna- tional migration will be more pro- nounced on the rental market. When new Canadians arrive in Canada, renting is usually the most prevalent tenure choice. They would move to homeownership after a few years once they establish a solid work and credit history.</p>
<p><strong>Mortgage Rates</strong></p>
<p>Mortgage rates are expected to be relatively stable throughout 2009, re- maining within 25-75 basis points of their current levels. Posted mortgage rates will increase very gradually dur- ing the course of 2010, reflecting a rise in government of Canada bond yields. For 2010, the one-year posted mort- gage rate will be in the 4.75-6.00 per cent range, while three- and five-year posted mortgage rates are forecast to be in the 5.00-6.75 per cent range.</p>
<div class="zemanta-pixie" style="margin-top: 10px; height: 15px;"><a class="zemanta-pixie-a" title="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" href="http://reblog.zemanta.com/zemified/ae098114-5dcd-4eba-8257-f50b728eabc2/"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" style="border: medium none; float: right;" src="http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=ae098114-5dcd-4eba-8257-f50b728eabc2" alt="Reblog this post [with Zemanta]" /></a><span class="zem-script more-related pretty-attribution"><script src="http://static.zemanta.com/readside/loader.js" type="text/javascript"></script></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/london-ontario-economic-trends-employment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Some more good news&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/some-more-good-news/</link>
		<comments>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/some-more-good-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CREIT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portfolio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hutchens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyhutchens.net/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even though people are still scared of  the &#8220;day after tomorrow&#8221;, there are plenty of good news, even in the &#8220;cursed&#8221; real estate market, if you are looking for them, here is just one example, notes Sandy Hutchens, a Canadian Real Estate Company that not only makes profit, it makes enough to be able to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even though people are still scared of  the &#8220;day after tomorrow&#8221;, there are plenty of good news, even in the &#8220;cursed&#8221; real estate market, if you are looking for them, here is just one example, notes Sandy Hutchens, a Canadian Real Estate Company that not only makes profit, it makes enough to be able to give out dividends:</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; color: #000000; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 16px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #333333; font-family: Arial; font-size: 12px;">Canadian Real Estate Investment Trust (&#8220;CREIT&#8221;)(TSX:REF.UN) today announced its May 2009 monthly distribution in the amount of 11.33 cents per unit (C$1.36 annualized). The May distribution will be payable on June 12, 2009 to Unitholders of record May 29, 2009.</p>
<p>CREIT is a real estate investment trust focused on accumulating a portfolio of high-quality real estate assets and delivering the benefits of real estate ownership to Unitholders. The primary benefit is a reliable and, over time, increasing monthly cash distribution. CREIT owns a portfolio of 160 retail, office and industrial properties.</span></span></p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/some-more-good-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Building Permits Data for March 2009</title>
		<link>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/building-permits-data-for-march-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/building-permits-data-for-march-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 18:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StatCan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alberta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edmonton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[February]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labrador]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manitoba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[March]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newfoundland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nova Scotia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Edward Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quebec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hutchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyhutchens.net/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contractors took out $4.5 billion in building permits in March, up 23.5% from February, halting five consecutive monthly declines. March&#8217;s increase came mainly from the non-residential sector in Ontario, Quebec and Alberta.Intentions in the non-residential sector rose 47.9% to $2.3 billion, in the wake of increases in the commercial and institutional components in Ontario, Quebec and Alberta.
In the residential sector, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contractors took out $4.5 billion in building permits in March, up 23.5% from February, halting five consecutive monthly declines. March&#8217;s increase came mainly from the non-residential sector in Ontario, Quebec and Alberta.Intentions in the non-residential sector rose 47.9% to $2.3 billion, in the wake of increases in the commercial and institutional components in Ontario, Quebec and Alberta.</p>
<p>In the residential sector, the value of permits advanced 5.0% to $2.2 billion. This increase was the result of higher construction intentions in both multi-family and single-family permits.</p>
<h2>Non-residential sector: Increases in both institutional and commercial components</h2>
<p>Following a 30.0% decrease in February, the value of the non-residential sector increased in six provinces, mainly as a result of gains in the commercial and institutional components.</p>
<p>In the commercial component, the value of permits increased 45.6% to $1.4 billion. This increase came mostly from higher construction intentions for office buildings in Ontario.</p>
<p>Permits in the institutional component increased 89.2% to $722 million, following a 54.2% decline in February. This increase was largely the result of higher construction intentions for medical buildings in British Columbia and government and education buildings in Ontario.</p>
<p>In the industrial component, the value of permits fell 8.8% to $216 million following a 14.7% increase in February. The decline in March was due to lower construction intentions in Prince Edward Island, Ontario, Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador.</p>
<h2>Residential sector: Intentions up for both single- and multi-family permits</h2>
<p>Municipalities issued $817 million worth of multi-family permits in March, up 7.3% from February. Quebec and Alberta accounted for most of the increase, although four other provinces showed higher intentions for the construction of multiple dwellings. In contrast, British Columbia posted a large decline.</p>
<p>Single-family permits halted their eight-month decline, increasing 3.7% to $1.4 billion. Ontario and Alberta accounted for most of the gain.</p>
<p>Municipalities approved 11,305 new dwellings in March, up 10.5%. This was due to a 26.5% increase in multi-family units to 6,479. The number of single-family units approved declined 5.6% to 4,826 units.</p>
<h2>Permits up in half of the provinces</h2>
<p>The value of building permits increased in half of the provinces in March.</p>
<p>The most significant increases occurred in Ontario (+45.7% to $1.8 billion), Quebec (+30.3% to $1.0 billion) and Alberta (+34.1% to $696 million). The increases were mostly a result of higher construction intentions in the non-residential sector.</p>
<p>Declines occurred in the Atlantic provinces, except for Newfoundland and Labrador, as well as Manitoba and British Columbia.</p>
<h2>Permits up in most census metropolitan areas</h2>
<p>The total value of permits was up in 24 of the 34 census metropolitan areas.</p>
<p>Permits values increased in Toronto as higher construction intentions in all non-residential components more than offset decreases in the residential sector.</p>
<p>The increase in permit value in Edmonton came from both the residential and non-residential sectors.</p>
<p>The value of building permits in Vancouver fell 42% to $192 millions, the sixth decline in seven months. This was a result of drops in all components except for permits for industrial projects. This report was reviewed by Sandy Hutchens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/building-permits-data-for-march-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparing Neighbourhoods &#8211; Vancouver</title>
		<link>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/comparing-neighbourhoods-vancouver/</link>
		<comments>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/comparing-neighbourhoods-vancouver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burnaby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fairview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kitsilano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Langley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighbourhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neighbourhoods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proximity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riley Park]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hutchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Cambie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Indicator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vancouver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West End]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yaletown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyhutchens.net/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CMHC&#8217;s study compares different types of neighborhoods located in the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD), based on their proximity to downtown and the types of homes they offer.
Source: Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood types were defined by establishing consistent thresholds for housing types, using data from the 2001 Census. Area boundaries (e.g. central area vs. inner or outer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CMHC&#8217;s study compares different types of neighborhoods located in the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD), based on their proximity to downtown and the types of homes they offer.</p>
<p><strong>Source:</strong> Statistics Canada. Neighbourhood types were defined by establishing consistent thresholds for housing types, using data from the 2001 Census. Area boundaries (e.g. central area vs. inner or outer suburbs) were based on definitions established by the Transportation Association of Canada&#8217;s Urban Indicator Survey project and refined through discussions with local municipal staff.</p>
<h2>Neighborhood Types</h2>
<p>Neighborhoods in the central area where homes are mostly high- and low-rise apartments and condominiums, like West End and Yaletown. Neighbourhoods in the central area offering a mix of housing types, like Kitsilano and Fairview. Neighbourhoods in the inner suburbs offering a mix of housing types*, like South Cambie and Riley Park. Neighbourhoods in the inner suburbs where homes are mostly detached, like those found in South Vancouver. Neighbourhoods in the outer suburbs offering a mix of housing types, like parts of Burnaby, such as Metrotown and &#8220;the Heights&#8221;. Neighbourhoods in the outer suburbs where homes are mostly detached, like parts of Surrey and Langley.</p>
<h2>How many rooms are there in the homes?</h2>
<p>Homes in suburban neighbourhoods, like South Vancouver, Surrey and Langley, offer more space, in terms of number of bedrooms and total rooms, than centrally located ones, in neighbourhoods like West End and Kitsilano. However, for many residents living in the urban core, a smaller home is a worthy trade-off for being <span class="CP___PAGEID_98606">closer to amenities</span> like parks and shopping.</p>
<h2>How close are the homes to schools, jobs, parks and other daily destinations?</h2>
<p>Homes in centrally located neighbourhoods, like Kitsilano and Yaletown, are closer to certain daily destinations like jobs, schools and access to rapid transit as well as shopping and entertainment than those in suburban neighbourhoods, like Langley, Burnaby and South Vancouver. Proximity to parks is highest in inner suburban neighbourhoods, like in South Vancouver.</p>
<p>Walking, cycling and using public transit are more feasible when these destinations are close to home and when routes for pedestrians and cyclists are pleasant and safe, for example, on streets with slow-moving cars, shade trees overhead and shops or homes beside the sidewalk, rather than parking lots. Therefore people who live in walk-cycle-transit friendly neighbourhoods have more choice in their mode of transportation — they don&#8217;t have to take their car for every trip. Walking or biking to get to your daily destinations is excellent for your health and driving less or needing one less car means you save money.</p>
<h2>Do people get by with fewer cars or do they drive less?</h2>
<p>The study estimates that people living in central area neighbourhoods, like Yaletown and Kitsilano, own fewer cars than those in suburban neighbourhoods, even accounting for the average number of people and income per household. They also drive less for weekday urban trips, like going to work or shopping. Owning fewer cars saves money and those who decide to manage without a car can expect big annual savings. Even car owners can expect to save money by driving less. If you drive 18,000 km per year, the average cost to own and operate a vehicle in Canada is over $9,000 annually.</p>
<h2>Do people reduce greenhouse gas emissions by driving less?</h2>
<p>Households located in central area neighbourhoods produce fewer greenhouse gases from weekday urban trips, like going to work or shopping, than those in suburban neighbourhoods.</p>
<h2>Is there a range of housing choices, so people can stay in the neighbourhood as their needs change?</h2>
<p>Centrally located neighbourhoods offering a mix of housing, like Kitsilano and Fairview, says Sandy Hutchens, have the broadest range of housing choices, followed by certain pockets of the suburbs, like parts of Burnaby and neighbourhoods in the inner suburbs, like Riley Park. First, these neighbourhoods offer a broader mix of housing types, including townhouses, high- and low-rise apartments, single-detached homes and semis. Many suburban neighbourhoods, like parts of Langley and South Vancouver, tend to offer a higher proportion of single-detached homes, while central area neighbourhoods, like West End and Yaletown, tend to offer mainly high- and low-rise apartments and condominiums. They also offer significantly more rental compared to owned housing, whereas the outer suburbs have a significantly higher proportion of owned housing and fewer rental options.</p>
<p>A neighbourhood that offers a variety of housing choices is a one where you can stay as your age, family and income change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/05/comparing-neighbourhoods-vancouver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Penfeld Court Steinbach, Manitoba</title>
		<link>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/04/penfeld-court-steinbach-manitoba/</link>
		<comments>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/04/penfeld-court-steinbach-manitoba/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 16:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manitoba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eastern Manitoba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hanover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[need]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prosperity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hutchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[southeastern Manitoba]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steinbach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winnipeg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyhutchens.net/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The population of the City of Steinbach, which is the economic centre of southeastern Manitoba, grew by nearly 20% between 2001 and 2006. However, growth and general prosperity is often offset by increased housing costs and difficulties experienced by the vulnerable in finding and affording appropriate rental housing. Steinbach&#8217;s motto is &#8220;Strong Roots, Real Growth,&#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The population of the City of Steinbach, which is the economic centre of southeastern Manitoba, grew by nearly 20% between 2001 and 2006. However, growth and general prosperity is often offset by increased housing costs and difficulties experienced by the vulnerable in finding and affording appropriate rental housing. Steinbach&#8217;s motto is &#8220;Strong Roots, Real Growth,&#8221; an apt formulation for a city that seems to strike an effective balance between the quest for economic prosperity and the maintenance of community values. When concerned residents began to realize the impact of rapid growth on the availability and affordability of housing for some of their vulnerable fellow citizens, they formed a group and approached a venerable institution with their plan.</p>
<p>Eden Health Care Services dates back over 40 years and originated in the Mennonite community in response to a perceived need for better mental health services. Today, it provides services across south-central and eastern Manitoba, including the City of Winnipeg.</p>
<p>The concerned Steinbach group sought a partnership with Eden to help develop and staff supportive affordable housing. They understood that people living with mental illnesses are one of the groups most at risk in tight rental markets.</p>
<p>The Affordable Housing Solution</p>
<p>Penfeld Court, a three-storey 24-unit apartment building comprising 16 one-bedroom and eight two-bedroom apartments, was completed in 2006. Rent supplements are available to 12 tenant households and the rents for the other units range from $491 to $635, including heat and hydro.</p>
<p>The project, says Sandy Hutchens, came to fruition through support from all levels of government and local community businesses and individuals. CMHC and the government of Manitoba made a contribution through the Canada-Manitoba Affordable Housing Program Agreement in the form of a capital grant of $1,248,000 and rent-geared-to-income assistance for 12 units valued at $32,000 annually.</p>
<p>The City of Steinbach contributed $100,000. The three surrounding Regional Municipalities of Hanover, Tache and Ste. Anne provided a total of $51,000. Private donations were also significant, at $285,000. The remaining capital cost of just over $1 million was financed through a mortgage loan. CMHC provided mortgage loan insurance.</p>
<p>Eden East, the local branch of Eden Health Care Services, bought the site and provides the support services for those tenants living with mental illnesses. All building staff has been trained to work with tenants with mental illnesses and learn to recognize behaviour that may indicate the need for assistance from Eden counsellors. Penfeld Court also has a volunteer board responsible for addressing neighbourhood and resident concerns, balancing between the need for community accountability and the rights of residents to housing, dignity and privacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/04/penfeld-court-steinbach-manitoba/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pallister Court &#8211; Ottawa, Ontario</title>
		<link>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/04/pallister-court-ottawa-ontario/</link>
		<comments>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/04/pallister-court-ottawa-ontario/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 15:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CMHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ontario]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affordable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nepean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ottawa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pallister Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hutchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyhutchens.net/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This, says Sandy Hutchens, proves that affordable housing is possible. A Nepean Housing Corporation (NHC) project shows that mixing affordable housing for people with severe or multiple disabilities with geared-to-income and market-rent units can create a sustainable community that provides a range of affordable housing solutions.
The Affordable Housing Solution
After declaring a vacant lot in Nepean&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This, says Sandy Hutchens, proves that affordable housing is possible. A Nepean Housing Corporation (NHC) project shows that mixing affordable housing for people with severe or multiple disabilities with geared-to-income and market-rent units can create a sustainable community that provides a range of affordable housing solutions.</p>
<p><strong>The Affordable Housing Solution</strong></p>
<p>After declaring a vacant lot in Nepean&#8217;s Centrepointe neighbourhood surplus, the City of Ottawa earmarked it for affordable housing development and issued a call for proposals. The City accepted NHC&#8217;s proposal to build a 62-unit complex that included 55, one- to four-bedroom townhouses and six apartments. Twenty-one units are rented at market rates; four are rented at 70 percent of the average market rent; and 37 are rent-geared-to-income, subsidized through the provincial Strong Communities Rent Supplement Program.</p>
<p>The key partnership is a five-unit group home, leased on a 20 year renewal lease to Ottawa Foyers Partage, which provides support to Ottawa-area people with multiple or severe disabilities. The group home is seamlessly integrated into the rest of the development. NHC constructed a standard building and the Ministry of Community and Social Services (MCSS) covered the costs of the features required for the building to operate as a group home. Padolsky Associates Inc. (architect) designed a fully accessible building, with wider doorways, a wheel-in shower and direct exits from each of the bedrooms to the outside. NHC, with financial support from MCSS, the assistance of the architect providing services free of change, and the builder contributing materials at cost, constructed a community space underneath the group home. This common space is used for community meetings, art and drama classes, and a youth drop in program.</p>
<p>During the development and approvals process, NHC identified and answered objections and gathered broader support through community consultations&#8211;an approach consistent with NHC&#8217;s commitment to build only developments that mix rent-geared-to-income with market units, with the aim of developing healthier communities.</p>
<p>The City of Ottawa contributed $1.8 million. NHC secured another $1.8 million from CMHC and the Province of Ontario through the Affordable Housing Initiative for the $9.5 million project. Construction of Pallister Court was completed in July 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/04/pallister-court-ottawa-ontario/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom Uphill Manor Fernie, British Columbia</title>
		<link>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/04/tom-uphill-manor-fernie-british-columbia/</link>
		<comments>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/04/tom-uphill-manor-fernie-british-columbia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[British Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMHC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[B.C]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fernie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[living]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hutchens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Uphill Manor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sandyhutchens.net/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2002, the Fernie Family Housing Society brought together the City of Fernie and five community organizations to study the community&#8217;s housing needs. The study, with the support of a CMHC Seed Funding grant and done by volunteers, showed that there was a shortage of accessible and affordable homes for seniors and people with disabilities.
The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2002, the Fernie Family Housing Society brought together the City of Fernie and five community organizations to study the community&#8217;s housing needs. The study, with the support of a CMHC Seed Funding grant and done by volunteers, showed that there was a shortage of accessible and affordable homes for seniors and people with disabilities.</p>
<p><strong>The Affordable Housing Solution</strong></p>
<p>The Interior Health Authority in British Columbia owned a building that was vacant because it was no longer suitable as a care facility. The Society found that it was eligible for funding from BC Housing if it converted the building to affordable housing. The Society purchased the building, valued at $800,000, for $10 from the Interior Health Authority after the B.C.government agreed to forgive the debt owing on the building.</p>
<p>The Society received an interest-free CMHC Proposal Development Funding (PDF) loan and BC Housing provided additional funding and expertise for an in-depth feasibility study of renovating the building as housing for seniors and people with disabilities.</p>
<p>The 27-unit Tom Uphill Manor opened in 2006. Twenty-four of the units provide supportive living for seniors and people living with disabilities. The other three units are temporary emergency housing for seniors looking for permanent housing that will meet their needs. Each of the 27 units is one bedroom and is fully accessible.</p>
<p>Tom Uphill Manor features a supportive living program that provides residents with services according to their needs, including housekeeping and laundry services. A sense of community, says Sandy Hutchens, is fostered through tenant meetings and meals are served in a common dining room. The capital cost was $3.51 million, with CMHC providing $576,000 through the Residential Rehabilitation Assistance Program (RRAP) and BC Housing contributing $1.85 million.</p>
<p>Other support included Fernie Family Housing Society, Columbia Basin Trust Fund; Real Estate Foundation of British Columbia; federal government&#8217;s National Homelessness Initiative; City of Fernie; other non-profit agencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sandyhutchens.net/2009/04/tom-uphill-manor-fernie-british-columbia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

